Follow up to Webinar on Social Media Tools

January 18th, 2012

Here are the answers to the questions you sent us:

By — Scott Wilder, Gary Angel and Marshall Sponder

As usual I enjoyed the recent Social Media Measurement webinar – and it was great to have Marshall on as well. Tools always draw a crowd and this was no exception. Here’s the questions we got along with our joint answers…

Question: What tools are best for measuring social media ROI or business lift, with respect to advertising on Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin, etc

Marshall: There’s actually a new platform launching next week called Unified (UnifiedSocial.com – I will be at the launch) that promises to do something like that – I’ve seen the platform close up and I can tell you I am impressed.  It may be that 2012 will be a year where ROI will no longer be a totally elusive goal for social media.

Gary: This is far more difficult, I think, than people generally believe. The only easy path to ROI measurement is when user’s are either directly engaged in commerce on social sites (which is rare) or are directly clicking through to sites where they are engaged in commerce. In these cases, measurement is generally a straightforward application of existing Web analytics campaign tracking capabilities. Unfortunately, this isn’t often the case. In some cases, I’m not even sure that ROI is the proper path to measurement and where it is, I don’t think there is likely to be one answer or approach. If your Facebook advertising is directed toward increasing your Fanbase, you need to be able to measure the incremental value of Fan (and this won’t be one value by the way) to your marketing. Getting that measure takes a concerted research effort and won’t (in my opinion) be delivered by any single tool. I sometimes think that it might be better for organizations to – first glance – concentrate on the obvious optimizations points. It’s much easier to measure which campaigns generates engaged Fans and calculate their cost-efficiency in that respect. You can then optimize campaigns within the set of those targeted toward increasing your fanbase. It’s not ideal, but it is more practical.

Scott: In most cases, companies have to guestimate true ROI because of some of the limitations of the tools and also companies own infrastructure. I find it useful to create proxies – like determining cost estimates for certain activities, which in turn, would lead to a transaction.

 

Question: US cost is too high – example Engage121 is $1000 per month for first base level search – one profile with 3 seats.

Marshal: Well, as Gary pointed out, Engage121 is designed for a specific use case and type of client such as an airline or large franchised business with thousands of stores that each want a different response and editorial controls – think Dominos or Dunkin Donuts (though I think neither are Engage121 clients).  My point being, you can’t take the price of a platform in isolation from the use case and clients for whom it is designed and targeted to.  The Dominos and Dunkin’s of the world have plenty of money and need for this kind of platform – but if your looking for an “affordable point of entry” into Social Engagement- than go with HootSuite and be happy there are still some free platforms you can play with and get your feet wet.

Gary: Not every market is going to be served by a tool like Google Analytics – free and really good. I basically agree with Marshall here. One thing I will say that’s more general is that in my experience some pricing models are much worse than others for doing serious enterprise work. To do our kind of measurement (Semphonic) we need a pretty free hand to construct, test and use profiles of all sorts and we generally need quite a lot of them because all the interesting questions involve categorization. At the enterprise level, I’d much rather pay a significant lump sum for a pretty free hand with the data than have a pay-per-item model. Pay-per-item models tend to cripple analysis.

 

Question: Do you have preference for tools to measure public opinion about political candidates – public policy or litigation issues?

Marshall: Yes, I am working with one right now – 6Dgree.com – we are tracking two candidates in Rhode Island and breaking down their overlapping audiences – along with “persona” breakdowns of their twitter streams – here is what that looks like (I erased the names of the candidates because this is still in the very early exploratory stage of what works).

Politcal Social Image

So far, the persona development breakdown looks impressive, as we can break it down by various sub dimensions and the founders at 6Dgree are very willing to pursue my suggestions, which really impresses me about them.  So yes, as of now, I believe 6Dgree might have a winning platform at an affordable price level that works for Twitter and Facebook.  Another is PeekAnalytics, but it’s not adapted specifically to Politics, yet.

6Dgree has done some interesting work with Australian Labor party around issues and produces a weekly portal report that breaks down tweets around several issues – I’m impressed with the solution, but of course, each campaign is slightly different and customization will always be a fact of life.

 

Question: What are the better tools for global internal scale? If any? Or just by world region?

Marshall: I like Comscore Media Metrix for world reporting – but that’s mostly panel based reporting -but it does a fairly extensive job of categorization of lifestyle and interest across channels, countries and technologies such as video, mobile and search.

Gary: Ditto Marshall. I like NMIncite for many larger markets. Alterian provides excellent language coverage.

 

Question: Do you believe the sampling of data should include statistical testing? Or how do you ensure your sampling is reflective of the entire population to provide confidence in the recommendations?

Marshall Well, Gary has a pretty good post on that, written recently, and I think, rather than speak to it, I’ll let Gary address it http://semphonic.blogs.com/semangel/2011/11/the-limits-of-machine-analysis.html

Gary: Thanks for the plug! Let me know if the several blogs I’ve written on the subject don’t fully answer the question! Social Media Measurement is an odd blend of attempts to get universal coverage and hidden samples – which makes a single approach challenging. You can use statistical testing to measure the variations in your samples and, where possible (it isn’t at all levels) that’s certainly advisable.

 

Question: When one wants to search and analyze Twitter postings and the topic is very low salience, so likely a very, very small percentage of Twitter mentions in U.S. in a given week, what are the best ways to maximize the amount of Twitter Firehose that you search to catch as many Twitter postings on your low salience topic as possible?

Gary: Depending on your method of access, you might want to start by talking with your vendor (if you’re using a vendor to make the initial data pulls). The initial pull is often tunable. This also speaks to your ability to capture the topic in all its forms. Traditional keyword research of the type often done for long-tail SEO can be useful. There is a range of tools appropriate for this – we’ve also just used scanning tools to pull the text off of sites (both client Websites, communities, and competitors) to try and build rich topic profiles. You can also take advantage of wildcards (in some tools) to scan from hash tags that include but are not limited to your topic. Hash tag references are often concatenations of the topic with other words and are nearly always pertinent. Sometimes, too, you have to be creative about what you’re looking for. If, for instance, you’re launching a product that is distinct, you can’t expect to identify potential influencers by targeting the obvious words – they generally won’t have any traction. So you have to look for analogs that might allow you to find and target a reasonably set of influencers.

 

Q: Any views on Netbase, which SAP just partnered with?

Marshall: Yes, it seems like a good partnership. Netbase does a pretty good job at NLP and creating structure and meaning around unstructured social data, and rather than SAP trying to build that (or buy Netbase, which is an option) they just partnered with them.

Scott: Netbase is doing some really interesting stuff, especially when it comes to Netnography (see www. Netnography.com). I think the partnership with SAP will be good because I know that the company is putting a lot of energy into understanding their own segmentation better. We are doing some work for them right now. SAP is also making a big push in mobile analytics and would probably pull Netbase into.

 

Question: Gary, perhaps you could ask each speaker to summarize which tool they think is strongest in each of the three key use cases you’ve outlined?

Marshall: Here’s a list of companies to consider

  • For PR Effectiveness  - I’d say mPACT and Cision.
  • For Consumer Sentiment – I would recommend be NetBase (in fact) for its NLP capabilities.
  • For Social Campaign Effectiveness – Unified (once it launches)

Gary:

  • For PR Effectiveness: NMIncite – though it does a poor job with identifying influencers the segmentation is excellent for tracking them.
  • For Consumer Sentiment: Clarabridge and Crimson Hexagon – though we haven’t gotten to use Crimson Hexagon as much as we’d really like.
  • For Social Campaign Effectiveness: This is a tough one. Most of the new management tools provide some integrated reporting – but I think that really good effectiveness measurement demands that level of reporting plus Web analytics, plus traditional listening configured for the purpose, and maybe CRM-based extracts at the individual level as well (we sometimes analyze Facebook campaigns by extracting all the individuals and looking at their pre/post behavior).
Share

Getting engaged with your customer(s)

January 16th, 2012

While the goal of marketing is to improve customer’s overall interactions with a brand, few organizations engage directly with their customer tribes or communities and therefore miss out on leveraging what is one of its most valuable assets.

Companies also have a hard time keeping up with the latest technology or vehicle for sharing information, rarely considering the types of networks and technologies people use to access the company’s information. Probably the best example is the slow adoption by companies to optimize websites for the increasing number of mobile users. As Jacob Nielsen’s research shows, most don’t have much information or capabilities to support users (or even bother supporting users) who access sites via a smart phone. The current success rate of completing a task for mobile web use is about 64%, the same as Nielsen research measured for desktop web use in 1999. Note: the current desktop success rate is 84%.

Increasingly, customer engagement starts with the mobile device. Most people begin their online journey to learn about a company through Facebook, a company website or Google search. Companies need to rethink how to develop and manage their digital experiences. Even the most successful communities will need to be better designed for mobile and smart phones.

Talk to Your Customers

To truly create a better customer experience, not only do you have to talk directly to a customer in person, but you also need to understand the tasks they want to accomplish with your products and services. In the case of mobile devices, there’s only a small amount of real estate on a mobile device that a company can use to show off their functionality, so mobile engagement will have to focus on highlighting the critical few items people might want to know in order to take the next step to learn about your product or service.

Fortunately, it is easier to learn about people’s interests and needs and to understand their perspective than ever before. Even if you are hesitant to talk to a customer directly, you can always email them, send them a direct message on Twitter or LinkedIn, or participate in their niche communities or personal interest groups, such as Fiskateers.com, which is designed for people interested in scrap booking and other handcrafts.

Learning to Engage

It is the responsibility however, of every employee, from senior management to the front-line worker, to interact directly with customers. And today the job of most marketers is to shepherd this process along by:

  1. Providing guidelines and guardrails to employees via opt-in training programs.
  2. Setting up a feedback mechanism where employees can ask questions.
  3. Understanding their customers tribes — who they spend time with, where they spend time, how they like to learn and how they use technology.
  4. Understanding the group dynamics of these tribes — who are the leaders, the relevant influencers.
  5. Partnering with tribal leaders and the not so powerful to learn about how they use your products, services, etc.
  6. Developing customer engagement maps to highlight all the customer (and business partner) touch points involved when interacting with your product or your various channels.

Customer engagement needs to be part of every company’s DNA and culture! Customer interaction must be supported by and rewarded by senior management. They need to ensure that the proper mechanisms and processes needed to successfully interact with users are in place and can be modified if necessary to integrate those lessons back into the organization.

Customers = Staff?

In fact, I would recommend going one step further and integrating some of your customers into your company teams. At Intuit, for example, a few customers sat in on our staff meetings. This allowed them to better understand some of the development challenges we faced in delivering (on) all of their requests.

In 2012, engagement with customers can improve by integrating them into the different areas of your company. Consider some of these ideas:

  1. Invite customers into your product development process, such as the British Telecommunication site and Giffgaff, where product ideas are tested initially in Giffgaff labs and made available to all members for a short period. If they are popular, they may be incorporated into the main product (and are withdrawn if not). The labs’ products are also beta tested by selected community members before release.
  2. Incorporate them into your customer service activities — Intuit’s Small Business Community has 70% of the questions answered by users and their overall resolution rate is higher than the support website.
  3. Bring them into your marketing efforts — when targeting your tribes, wouldn’t it be nice to have some help figuring out how to phrase a sentence or describe a product, or list out a how-to by someone who is actually using your product.
  4. Be sure to bring them into your partner programs. Constant Contact, traditionally an email provider, has built an effective partner program consisting of all the parties needed to assist a small business’s marketing organization, such as copywriter, designers, etc. Each company provides valuable feedback on how Constant Contact can improve their training program
Other parts of the organization can also tap into the wisdom of the tribes. Human Resources, for example, can leverage a business such as Intern Match, which offers the largest database of college interns, to help find future employees for a company. People can get rewarded for recommending students to a company.

Perhaps most importantly, customer engagement should be embedded into a company’s products and services. General Motors’ OnStar could be a good example. Today, it mainly provides crash, roadside and emergency assistance. But imagine if GM reached out to drivers and obtained real-time feedback while they were driving via an opt-in ongoing survey with some sort of automatic diagnostic system that was part of the car. Why wait until there is an actual problem or crisis to leverage the OnStar system? Imagine, too, if OnStar leveraged its GPS system and provided information on special sales, such as Groupon or event sites, such as EventBrite.

Customer engagement does not have to take place on your company’s own branded website or via your own infrastructure. Companies can easily identify its relevant promoters — ambassadors of a sort — on Facebook, Twitter and other social networks and have these individuals answer product or services related questions. And you don’t have to pay these ambassadors. Instead, you can help support their own businesses – tools, software and consulting – be successful.

As highlighted above, customer engagement can happen on different platforms, different social networks and among different groups of people in a company. It should be looked at as a journey that is always measured and improved upon. Some companies use NetPromoter Scores to measure their success in this area. Forrester Research scores engagement based on the level of involvement, interaction, intimacy and influence an individual has with a brand over time. The goal, in addition to scoring engagement, should be to listen carefully to what users are saying and how they are saying it. At the end of the day, walking in their shoes and listening carefully to their words will be more valuable then any single score or rating.

(This first appeared at http://www.cmswire.com/)

Share

Social Media Tools

January 11th, 2012

The three amigos, Gary Angel from Semphonic, Marshall Sponder from WebGuruAnalytics.com and myself did a webinar today on Social Media Tools. Check out the deck. There’s lots of information. (Every time I talked to these guys, I learn something!)

And if you have the time, you can listen to a recording of the webinar here.
Share

Big Data DNA !!

January 10th, 2012

Recently, a client told me that Big Data is an overused term. Unfortunately, it is also a relatively new area for marketers. A few years ago, bloggers started emphasizing the importance for CMOs to hire marketer who know technology, and now, there is a lot of commentary on the web about hiring data experts. In fact, one of the hot new job titles is data scientist.

One good thing about the Internet is that it has forced even traditional brand marketers to take a more rigorous approach towards analytics. Marketers have to get more data conscious focusing on customer data, prospect data, competitive data, online data, etc. They need to take a more holistic approach to data – and get Big Data thinking in their own DNA and into their team’s DNA.

BigData SW1 300x260 Big Data DNASlowly but surely this is happening. A recent eMarketer survey showed, however, there are still some inconsistencies in how it is defined. 48% of US Data practitioners defined big data as the ‘aggregate of external and internal web base data.’ 21% were unsure to how to even go about defining Big Data.

The  findings are a bit troubling, since Big Data is one of the top priorities of C-level leaders. For example, it is the number one concern of CIOs and is quickly becoming a big issue for marketers.

eMarketer highlighted the fact that more than half the companies they surveyed consider big data as a way to monitor competitors or their own brand. I would not call this Big Data analysis, however. Certainly using a Radian6 or a Scoutlabs  monitoring tool is not the same as doing Big Data analysis. Monitoring ‘what people are saying on the web’ rarely requires a lot of data crunching.

Besides coming up with a consistent definition of Big Data, we also need to find individuals to hire who now how to leverage the tools to crunch big data numbers, have the time to dedicate to a Big Data project, and have the experience to learn from their findings.

BigData SW2 273x300 Big Data DNAPutting definitions aside, it is clear that marketing departments need to get serious about Big Data (large data sets that can’t be handled by traditional tools) and focus on integrating the tools and resources for this area in their organization. I recommend that they hire someone who has experience in handling big data sets. Some of the idea characteristics include:

  • Intellectual curiosity and a strong desire to solve problems
  • Experience in data research
  • Open-mindedness and the ability to look at problems from different perspectives
  • A touch of skepticism to challenge traditional beliefs and practices
  • Ability to frame and communicate ideas based on data findings

After all, ‘if you can’t measure it, how are you going to improve on it?’

Share

THINK BIG data

January 4th, 2012

If you are looking to get ahead of your competition, think “Big Data.” It is one of the top issues that keeps the C-suite awake at night. And guess what. The data is just going to continue to grow and grow.

Recently, a McKinsey research study showed that it was one of the top priorities for CIOs and another study by Corporate Executive Board highlighted it as one of the key issues that CMOs face today.

Historically, these two groups rarely agreed on the biggest challenge(s) facing their organization. With the advent of social media and mobile mania, however, times are changing. Both CMOs and CIOs are now trying to figure out what just hit them; Few executives are prepared for this deluge of data. And few companies have the tools or the skilled workers to handle it.

Even though marketers are becoming more technical, they are still feeling challenged to decipher what the data is telling them. With all the talk of ROI, it is amazing how many CMOs still don’t understand the economics of their business. Unless they can figure this out, they will loose out to their competitors.

Managing this big elephant can be a strategic advantage for companies. Reid Hoffman, the founder of LinkedIn recently highlighted this in Fast Company.

As the activity in this space gets denser, it becomes important for [deals companies] to maintain their value proposition, both for the merchant and the consumer, and to be able to match the right two.

The ability to do that kind of matching, off the data, is the kind of thing that has a robust, at-scale, defensible value proposition and makes it harder for other people to offer products that are as good.

Reid, who is now also a venture capitalist recently said that each company in his portfolio will be asked to have a Big Data strategy. So, who will be drive this in a company? Marketers? IT folks? Marketers should get a head start and begin driving this — just like they often find themselves driving social media policies and training. I am not saying the social, mobile and big data are the same thing, but rather, Big Data offers another opportunity for marketers to play a leadership role in defining the vision and the requirements. And then partner with IT to ensure the right infrastructure in place.

Big Data is important because it enables marketers to slice the onion even thinner and develop more detailed customer segment information. In fact, some people are referring to this as ‘Digital Characteristics.’ Even more important, customer information can be refined and updated real time, leading to more customized promotions. Imagine tracking a mobile phone users behavior real time and adjusting your promotions accordingly. Or better yet, up-selling or cross-selling on their recent behavior.

So, I recommend following steps to take Big Data the basket:

  1. Make it part of your DNA; be clear (and communicate to the organization) why you are embracing big data – that it is not only a trendy phrase, but also a way of being;
  2. Create the mindset that this will be a journey where you will have to be flexible and not have your KPIs set in stone and that you will tweak them and refine them overtime (This is the way of being!)
  3. Hire a data scientist and a business analyst who have experience in handling large data sets
  4. Train each employee to think about data — (Note: But don’t only think about quantitative information because the qualitative data is just as important)
  5. Be open to a cross-functional approach (Hey marketers, you can lead this charge) to leveraging large amounts of information.
  6. Know that data will grow exponentially, so be prepared to build the infrastructure and to build an infrastructure that can (continue) to scale over time
  7. Meet several times a week to discuss the changing nature of your data and your business (meeting once a week is not enough)
  8. Understand that big data sets could kill the concept of sampling

And last, but not least, CMOs should think of CIOs as their ally when venturing on the Big Data journey. Together, they should work to understand and leverage the large data sets and extensive learnings coming from their customers behavior online. This information will provide insights that will lead to more innovation, better products and more sales.

How are you thinking about Big Data?

Share

Hyper Social Recruting (Webinar deck)

December 15th, 2011

Here’s the presentation, Gary Angel from Semphonic and I did recently on Hyper Social Recruiting

Here’s the recording and the webinar I did with Gary Angel, ace analytics guru from Semphonic, Inc.

Share

CloudGate

December 11th, 2011

Mashable’s Ben Parr called it Cloudgate to describe what happened when Amazon’s Elastic Could Computer (EC2) went down leaving some major websites in the dust, such as FourSquare, Quora, Wildfire, and more. I think this caught everyone off guard because there had been numerous articles about Amazon’s lead in the Cloud Computing space. The company has been at it for a while and has a head start in learning how to build an efficient cloud infrastructure.Last week, though, we had a friendly reminder that even the good can die young. That we have to always be prepared for the unexpected. (Yes, that’s one of my mottos). Some valuable lessons:

  • Build redundancy – and if your hosting partner can’t provide it, go find another partner to act as your back up.
  • Take service level agreement seriously – some of my friends tell me they were not very stringent
  • Employ some of your own monitoring tools just so you don’t loose any time to be notified about your site being down
  • Cloud Disaster Recover Options — Look into third parties to help you with this
  • Leverage Twitter to send out alerts and let people know what is going on.
  • Follow up with customers and let them know what happened, that you apologize and that you want their suggestions of how to be notified in the future (I only heard from one company who was impacted)
  • Impact of new features and functionality — when you add new i-candy to your site or backend functionality, make sure to conduct complete end-to-end testing

Related articles:Amazon cloud crashes endangers federal websitesIs your favorite website down today? Blame AmazonAmazon takes down the DOE

Share

Risk Post of the Day

December 11th, 2011
Is Online Video a Legal Danger for you Businessby Grant Crowell , Thursday, March 31, 2011Online video continues to boom, with an explosion of content, technologies, communities and campaign spending. But what hasn’t been discussed is the increase in legal problems for businesses with online video — and the fact that most marketers today still have no idea what the legal issues with online video are.Lack of knowledge of these legal issues is presenting more serious consequences for businesses. These can range from the removal of their videos from sharing sites and web hosts and cancellation of their accounts, to the more serious consequences of civil lawsuits with heavy fines, and even potential criminal charges. All of these can cause real damage to ROI, serious businesses losses, and a negative effect on one’s brand and professional reputation.How did we get to this point? First you might be inclined to think back to the last decade of the 20th century, when the Web was considered to be the Wild West of marketing — a label connotating tolerance of some degree of lawlessness, Our legal issues then were largely around intellectual property and stealing other’s content — including copyright and trademark infringement. In the first decade of the 21st century, the birth and growth of social media and online video brought about new legal concerns such as privacy rights.As we have progress into the second decade of the 21st century, improved interactive technologies and increased rewards for producing and marketing video content and campaigns – be it blanketing Google’s search results with video listings, or achieving a viral video success – have driven us further into real-time marketing, with less time for thinking things through properly. It has turned more businesses and entrepreneurs into instinctive marketers than restrained, thoughtful ones. They grow accustomed to taking whatever content they can find without real concern of ownership, publishing it immediately without real concern for accuracy, and pushing social limits to get views on the cheap. Basically, they paying little or no attention to the fact that a virtual creation of a video may cause real problems to real people.What is it about the medium of video that is triggering such a legal reaction – not just in civil courts, but also now with real criminal prosecutions? I’ve seen the causes to be manifold:·
  • Responsiveness - Marketers know that people typically have a more visceral response to video than other single media, online or offline. The problem for businesses is that producing a video to elicit a strong reaction with an intended positive outcome for your business, also can risk producing an equally strong negative reaction. (Sometimes businesses even intend to generate a strong negative reaction, thinking that it will generate more publicity they can harness.) So when audiences and authorities online see a video that ends up generating a negative reaction, they could be more likely to experience feelings of outrage, and act on it through lawsuits and even criminal prosecutions.·
  • Virility - Online video has its own extremely large communities on YouTube, Facebook and most any social network that are built around sharing content with others. Add to the fact that video naturally lends itself to sharing, and you can realize how a negative reaction by a few individuals over a video can compound into a negative reaction by many people very quickly.·
  • Ignorance - Most people are still not aware of YouTube’s, Facebook’s, and other social media sites’ terms of service, community guidelines, and copyright and trademark guidelines.·
  • Disinterest - Many video users aren’t inclined to act responsibly and give proper attention to any guidelines, seeing them as getting in the way of their marketing and fun.·
  • Confusion - With online video and most other social media, much of the law is evolving in the courts, making it extremely difficult sometimes for even attorneys to feel secure about what’s permissible to do and what isn’t.·
  • Ubiquity - Immersed in an online world where being the fastest and most outrageous is both rewarded and commonplace, businesspeople’s perceptions of what’s legally permissible can get skewed.It’s time for marketers and all professionals involved in the online video industry to get a basic legal video education. We need to start paying more attention to legal rights and responsibilities for this most powerful media, getting permission before publishing, and consulting with attorneys specializing in intellectual property, Internet law, and entertainment law who have a good grasp on the online video landscape. To not exercise this basic responsibility for how we choose to use online video in our business would bring us down — from a positive YouTube culture to a negative “You Sued” culture.Originally posted on MediaPost.com
Share

CSI in the Cloud

December 11th, 2011
Symantec and the Ponemon Institute just release a report on the cost of data breach. It showed the cost of a data breach continues to increase each year and is now at an average $7.2 million per incident, up 7 percent from 2009. That’s $214 for every compromised customer record breached. Part of this increase was caused by the number of criminal acts, but there are other factors involved too. These include: detection, forensics (now, I think this would be a great profession — CSI in the Cloud — and upfront work. Most companies don’t put enough energy in the ‘pre-ememptive stage.’ While IT might all over this, it’s important to work with employees so they can understand the risks. It’s important to incorporate protecting companies data into the company’s DNA. And I am not talking about a 1 time training session each year. This is especially true as companies open up their sites to social networks’ authentication systems! While many people believe the costs and data issues will decrease over time, I have a different perspective. Our world is getting cloudier — and the more we do away from our own box (laptops, PCs, etc.) the more protecting customer data and company information will become an issue.
Share

Simple Framework for a Crisis

December 11th, 2011
While working with the Adobe Enterprise Team, I was introduced to Jacob Morgan, who consults to a number of companies (and has a good blog) about CRM.He recently wrote about a book called “The New Supply Chain Agenda,” by Reuben E. Slone, J. Paul Dittmann, and John T. Mentzer, and how it provides a ‘risk’ model that could also be used for evaluating ‘risk’ for a social business, produce or venture.The framework, which is highlighted in the book, is outlined below.Again, the key is that it is all about doing the work upfront, planning for a potential crisis, and evaluating your strengths and weaknesses. It’s a simply model, but it does add some structure to an often unstructured or forgotten practice. Financial and Insurance Risk Managers run models and build frameworks all the time. It’s just the other folks in the organization, who forget to plan.The first steps are to look at:

  • Severity
  • Probability of Occurrence
  • Probability of early detection

And then you score your ‘RISK’ with a simple probability index. One key point is that this is not done by a single group. It requires a cross-functional teamwork. At one of my clients, we built a ‘Center of Excellence’ to quarterback this process. Some companies have the Social Media Team do this. My only caution here is that this could put more of a marketing lens on things vs. looking at each area of the company: Finance, Legal, Privacy, Product Development, etc.The last two steps involve creating Recommended Actions and Responsibility.Recommended Actions are good, but I would probably make it stronger by saying “Action Plan.” I hate leaving things open for interpretation. Obviously during the crisis itself, the ‘owner’ has the flexibility to change the action plan a bit. Having an owner, someone who is ultimately responsible is important. And having a back up owner is important too.In the chart above, it lists different departments responsible for implementing an action plan. I prefer to assign the name of someone and their back up. Ownership is the key in preparing for and implementing ‘Risk Management.’One model for the ownership part is the DACI framework, where there is:

  • 1 Driver (D)
  • 1 Approver (A)
  • Multiple consultants, who help provide in put into the planning (C)
  • Multiple Informed people, who just need to know what is going on in case they are called upon and need to get up to speed quickly (I)

I will discuss the DACI model in more detail in a future post…

Share